Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Take a look around and join the community. Have a topic? Join us and start a thread.
«1

Comments

  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Posts: 1,251
    250 Answers 1000 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    AZDuck said:
    "No puppet, no puppet...you're the puppet!"

    An Obese Orangutan
    Oct. 19, 2016
    BennyBeaverHoustonHusky
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Posts: 2,912
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    Private military contractors meet with foreign diplomats in an unofficial capacity under every regime. Blackwater was doing the same shit under Obubba.

    Yawn.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 27,289
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    I love the smell of desperation in the morning.

    I'm sue the smoking gun on Russian collusion is somewhere in the unmasked eavesdropping on a political opponent
    HoustonHuskydoogiesalemcoogMisterEm
  • AZDuckAZDuck Posts: 13,896
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fucktard of the Week Award
    Officials said Zayed and his brother, the UAE’s national security adviser, coordinated the Seychelles meeting with Russian government officials with the goal of establishing an unofficial back channel between Trump and Putin.

    Officials said Zayed wanted to be helpful to both leaders, who had talked about working more closely together, a policy objective long advocated by the crown prince. The UAE, which sees Iran as one of its main enemies, also shared the Trump team’s interest in finding ways to drive a wedge between Moscow and Tehran.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/blackwater-founder-held-secret-seychelles-meeting-to-establish-trump-putin-back-channel/2017/04/03/95908a08-1648-11e7-ada0-1489b735b3a3_story.html?utm_term=.88f20b311c2b
  • doogiedoogie Posts: 5,814
    5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    So, Team Obama is pissed Trump is gonna withdraw all the support they received over the past 8 years and they're pissed?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 12,241
    10000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    doogie said:

    So, Team Obama is pissed Trump is gonna withdraw all the support they received over the past 8 years and they're pissed?

    Your loyalty is duly noted.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Posts: 11,941
    10000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    I had assumed that devos simply nought her way into the cabinet with donations.

    Maybe there were indeed other reasons...
    I remember reading about a trump server the FBI is investigating for communication with a bank in cypress that was also somehow connected to dick devos.
    We'll see. But these guys are greedy pricks. Including trump. Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial
  • doogiedoogie Posts: 5,814
    5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    Simpleton thinking
    TierbsHsotBoobsAZDuck
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 12,241
    10000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    dhdawg said:

    Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

    It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

    Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

    Comedy.

    Funnier still, you read accusations of leaks from Susan rice and you believe that with no evidence. I'm still waiting for the wiretapping evidence.
    HoustonHuskyRaceBannonMisterEmPurpleJDoogles
  • doogiedoogie Posts: 5,814
    5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    NY Times reported they have verified proof. Suddenly that has become meaningless to you?
  • dhdawgdhdawg Posts: 11,941
    10000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    dhdawg said:

    Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

    It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

    Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

    Comedy.

    I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.

    Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort
    RaceBannon
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 12,241
    10000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

    It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

    Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

    Comedy.

    I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.

    Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort
    I'm hearing the hammer is going to drop any day on Benghazi.
    TierbsHsotBoobsIntersectional_Dawg
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Posts: 1,875
    Swaye's Wigwam Solar Eclipse Donator 250 Answers 1000 Comments
    2001400ex said:

    dhdawg said:

    Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

    It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

    Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

    Comedy.

    Funnier still, you read accusations of leaks from Susan rice and you believe that with no evidence. I'm still waiting for the wiretapping evidence.
    No evidence? There were leaks of classified material. No one except maybe HondoFS disputes that.

    She was at least one of (WSJ saying there was at least one other) that is now documented in computer logs to have unmasked officials in intelligence reports. She may or may not be the one that leaked it to the press, but the reports in which she unmasked people got leaked which at least puts her on the radar. You know, of an actual crime.

    Meanwhile, the "best" evidence of Russian "connections" after 8 months of leaks and speculations of nutjobs like you is a fake report out of Ukraine on Manefort and some guy who doesn't work for Trump and runs a business meeting some Russian guy after the election.

    Unless, of course, you want to consider Russia paying Bill Clinton millions and donating to the Clinton Foundation as interfering with the US election and policy...
    GrundleStiltzkinRaceBannon
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Posts: 1,875
    Swaye's Wigwam Solar Eclipse Donator 250 Answers 1000 Comments
    edited April 2017
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

    It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

    Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

    Comedy.

    I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.

    Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort
    Not the worst thing ever? It wasn't WW3, but it was bad. And it was a result of shitty policy on many fronts.

    Just as bad, however, was lying about it and telling lemmings like you it was a YouTube video and not terrorists doing it because there was an election in a few weeks and they didn't want the bad press.

    And "more proof"? Try "any proof" to start with...the only one documented as having taken millions from Russia were the Clintons. Everyone seems to forget that little nugget.
Sign In or Register to comment.