Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Take a look around and join the community. Have a topic? Join us and start a thread.

Things doogs would say

2»

Comments

  • haiehaie Posts: 4,069
    Standard Supporter 250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes
    ^ doog who is ACTUALLY scared of the revenge factor.
    TierbsHsotBoobsbackthepack
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Posts: 5,345
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Up Votes

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
    TierbsHsotBoobsoregonblitzkriegbackthepack
  • haiehaie Posts: 4,069
    Standard Supporter 250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
    That is the real definition of a doog.
    TierbsHsotBoobsbackthepack
  • H_DH_D Posts: 5,628
    Swaye's Wigwam 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    edited September 5

    Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened

    You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.
    GrundleStiltzkinbackthepack
  • H_D said:

    Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened

    You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.
    Gus Johnson has called the two greatest UCLA comebacks of my lifetime.
    H_DdncbackthepackEdwin_Bambino
  • haie said:

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
    That is the real definition of a doog.
    The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:

    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie
    TierbsHsotBoobsbackthepack
  • haiehaie Posts: 4,069
    Standard Supporter 250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes

    haie said:

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
    That is the real definition of a doog.
    The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:

    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie
    image
  • Passion said:

    Doogles said:

    Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.

    Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?
    His name was Cozetto and he was one tough SOB.
    backthepackGrundleStiltzkin
  • TurdBufferTurdBuffer Posts: 3,843
    2500 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    Thanks Great Uncle Race. It's always special to hear from Gil Dobie's spiritual advisor.
    TierbsHsotBoobs
  • Passion said:

    Doogles said:

    Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.

    Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?
    His name was Cozetto and he was one tough SOB.
    You wouldn't want to Cozetto when he's angry.
    GrundleStiltzkinMisterEm
  • Passion said:

    Doogles said:

    Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.

    Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?
    His name was Cozetto and he was one tough SOB.
    You wouldn't want to Cozetto when he's angry.
    *see
    CFetters_Nacho_LoverGrundleStiltzkin
  • Passion said:

    Doogles said:

    Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.

    Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?
    His name was Cozetto and he was one tough SOB.
    You wouldn't want to Cozetto when he's angry.
    This guy gets it
    TierbsHsotBoobsCFetters_Nacho_LoverGrundleStiltzkin
Sign In or Register to comment.