Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Take a look around and join the community. Have a topic? Join us and start a thread.

UW is a "fraud" according to

24

Comments

  • TurdBufferTurdBuffer Posts: 3,823
    2500 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like, fairly solid incredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.

    The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.

    FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.
    Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.

    Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.

    Fuck off and die.
    Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!

    But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.

    Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
    You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.
    The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.
    I was making fun of the script from the announcers and not trying to put lipstick on a pig. The Defense had a bad game on the road against a mediocre team on the road. Funny thing is giving up 30 pts once in the while in the PAC shouldn't be that big of a deal; plenty of great teams have given that up and still won. But it's death sentence when your offense is "differently-abled" and that's the root issue here. UW should have been up 21- 7 at half and been able to win a 35- 30 type game.
    We've heard the argument that this defense, despite losing 3 guys to the draft, was "better" than last year's. I think that's a very relative conclusion, and not true. We are not as good on the back end, nor at LB, IMO, and the Buck position has not produced pressure like we saw with Psalm, even though his pressure was typically misdirected, out-of-whack, and ineffective. The DL has played well, and the LBs seem faster, but not as sure-handed when tackling as last year, and not hitting anyone very hard, compared to the last couple years.

    The low scoring numbers have also been a little deceiving, because we haven't played against as many good QBs as last year. Rosen was gone after 1.5 quarters, Burmeister was a no-show, and Cal's & OSU's QBs were sub-par at best. Great scoring #'s against those anemic offenses does not indicate a D that's "better than last year" IMO.

    Stats are for losers.
    GrundleStiltzkinYellowSnow
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 4,224
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like, fairly solid incredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.

    The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.

    FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.
    Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.

    Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.

    Fuck off and die.
    Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!

    But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.

    Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.

    Try and think about it this way. Axe yourself how you'd score it if it had been Oregon on the field against the Furd.
    Once again, more departure from actual reality. I guess that's what it takes to be you.
    (.5) ❤️ = (1) ❤️

    Once again, saying "make shit up" and "departure from reality" over and over doesn't make you right or cogent or anything but redundant. You lost to a one-legged man in an ass kicking contest. Get over it and take it like a man.
    Only you would describe a RB who runs 30 times for 166 yards as having a "flat tire." Because only you would have such drizzly shit dripping from your mouth, as usual.
    You miss the point ass muncher. The results are in the books. Even a shit brain like you can’t revise it now. The only question is whether Love was hurt. Let’s check the facts (not your shit brain opinion, which matters less than the dump I took this morning):
    1. He injured his ankle weeks ago and was hurt enough to sit out Oregon State.
    2. He was Gimpy Gary against the Kewgs and ran for a whopping 69 yards.
    3. He either aggravated the ankle against the Doogs or he fake aggravated it against the Doogs. Only the Doogs can be in charge of this theory; it’s just too fucking stupid for anyone else to maintain.
    4. If he was faking, he did a good fucking job of it, sitting out on several key drives on which his shit backup couldn’t gain a yard.
    5. Despite these facts, Turdeater says Creepycoug is just making shit up.
    6. Turdy the Goon just keeps repeating himself but doesn’t ever say exactly what Creepy’s making up.
    7. Just to rub Turdy’s fucking nose in it: the Kewgs held him to 69!!! The #1 defense gave up almost two hundy and three scores.

    I mean, what in the fuck do you want me to do with this shit narrative of yours Sally?
    RaceBannonEwaDawg
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 4,224
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like, fairly solid incredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.

    The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.

    FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.
    Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.

    Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.

    Fuck off and die.
    Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!

    But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.

    Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
    You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.
    The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.
    I was making fun of the script from the announcers and not trying to put lipstick on a pig. The Defense had a bad game on the road against a mediocre team on the road. Funny thing is giving up 30 pts once in the while in the PAC shouldn't be that big of a deal; plenty of great teams have given that up and still won. But it's death sentence when your offense is "differently-abled" and that's the root issue here. UW should have been up 21- 7 at half and been able to win a 35- 30 type game.
    Too bad Turdy the Gimp can't benefit from 1/4th of your IQ. Can't argue with any of that.
    RaceBannonEwaDawg
  • TurdBufferTurdBuffer Posts: 3,823
    2500 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.

    In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks.
    FremontTroll
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 4,224
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.

    In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks.

    Welcome to like every fucking year and every fucking team that doesn't go start to finish unbeaten. But even a broken clock is right twice a day.
    RaceBannon
  • BreadBread Posts: 761
    250 Answers 500 Up Votes 500 Awesomes 500 Comments
    The Team isn't a Fraud. Brownsocks is. at one point he had 1:8 hiesman odds.
    Doog_de_Jourbackthepack
  • TurdBufferTurdBuffer Posts: 3,823
    2500 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    edited November 13

    Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.

    In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks.

    Welcome to like every fucking year and every fucking team that doesn't go start to finish unbeaten. But even a broken clock is right twice a day.
    You realize you troll like a child-rapist, don't you?

    The "creepy" all makes sense now.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Posts: 4,306
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    You guys are an 8 or 9 win team this year at best which is why preseason rankings are dumb.

    Last year you got pushed around by Bama and USC. Bama I get, USC not so much. Your D was beyond stacked last year but the O was a liability. This year is a decent defense with the offense still being a liability. Next year both will be a liability.

    It was a great one year run. The Seattle Times piece in 12 years will be great.
    jecorneldncBaldwinIVRaceBannonPetermanBaseman
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Posts: 3,506
    Standard Supporter 2500 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like, fairly solid incredibly mediocre, gimpy one-horse Stanford team with a better game plan and QB that doesn't shit himself at the first sign of resistance.

    The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.

    FTFY. You don't lose to San Diego State and beat 1-7 Oregon State by 1 poont and get to wear the "fairly solid" badge.
    Okay, Cuog, here it is: You're a fucking moron. Love ran well the entire game, despite a bum ankle. Everyone saw his runs, as well as his limping off the field to get help from the trainers. That mother fucker blasted through the holes and around the corner very well, changed direction and accelerated at about 90% of his normal self. Love's effort and game, in and of themselves, were fucking amazing for a guy with an injured ankle.

    Drooling morons like you keep repeating shit that didn't happen just to talk shit, while demonstrating your complete ignorance of reality. Prototypical fucking Cuog bullshit, from a loser from a loser school and loser program. The Cuogs could win the NC and their stupid fucking fans like you would still be complete fucking losers because you make shit up out of whole cloth due to your ignorance, want of acceptance, and desire to count in places you don't.

    Fuck off and die.
    Ahh, this made my day. You sound like @Tequilla sending me a "Fuck Off!!!!!" PM. Kudos to you for having the balls to say it TO MY FACE!!

    But pray tell: what did I make up? Did Love have a flat tire or not? If your D were that elite, keeping him at under 150 shouldn't be a problem, especially since you weren't facing any kind of competent passing attack.

    Don't try and complicate it for obfuscation purposes fuck face: the guy came in with a bad ankle, he fucked it up more during the game, and you benefitted from it. He wasn't 100% and he had to sit a lot. If he's 100% maybe the game isn't even close.
    You obviously weren't listening the NASCAR network announcers, Creep. They said 75% of Bryce Love is still better than almost any other back in the country. So basically he was 75%, which is still C+ Bryce Love and therefore it doesn't matter if he's 75% or 100% because he's the greatest Stanford back since Christian McCaffrey.
    The #1 defense should be able to contain him when it doesn't have to worry about a big air game. Or so I'm told. And he had to sit for key stretches. It's ugly. Don't try and put lipstick on it.
    I was making fun of the script from the announcers and not trying to put lipstick on a pig. The Defense had a bad game on the road against a mediocre team on the road. Funny thing is giving up 30 pts once in the while in the PAC shouldn't be that big of a deal; plenty of great teams have given that up and still won. But it's death sentence when your offense is "differently-abled" and that's the root issue here. UW should have been up 21- 7 at half and been able to win a 35- 30 type game.
    We've heard the argument that this defense, despite losing 3 guys to the draft, was "better" than last year's. I think that's a very relative conclusion, and not true. We are not as good on the back end, nor at LB, IMO, and the Buck position has not produced pressure like we saw with Psalm, even though his pressure was typically misdirected, out-of-whack, and ineffective. The DL has played well, and the LBs seem faster, but not as sure-handed when tackling as last year, and not hitting anyone very hard, compared to the last couple years.

    The low scoring numbers have also been a little deceiving, because we haven't played against as many good QBs as last year. Rosen was gone after 1.5 quarters, Burmeister was a no-show, and Cal's & OSU's QBs were sub-par at best. Great scoring #'s against those anemic offenses does not indicate a D that's "better than last year" IMO.

    Stats are for losers.
    All that being said Jake Browning Sucks it's still a pretty dang good defense. Whether or not it's better or not than last year or if the stats are skewed by cupcakes is superfluous in my estimation. It's still a D that is easily good enough to win PAC championships. We are fortunate as hell to have an evil genius like Kawasaki; fuck the entire offense though except for RB's, TE's and some of the OL pieces. We need better dudes and better coaching.
    TurdBuffer
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 4,224
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes

    Perhaps the funniest thing about this article, is the blatant hypocrisy of the very same jack-off sports press that first labels a team as great or NC worthy, that then turns around and labels a team a "fraud" when they underachieve. And these jack-offs expect to be taken seriously.

    In light of the preceding, Jake Browning still sucks.

    Welcome to like every fucking year and every fucking team that doesn't go start to finish unbeaten. But even a broken clock is right twice a day.
    You realize you troll like a child-rapist, don't you?

    The "creepy" all makes sense now.
    Well, I guess even a full-blown short bus rider can catch up eventually.

    Your protestations on Love are still nuclear fucking stoopid, poontless, doogy and nonsensical. And dripping with chunt juice.

    Keep getting mad about it Kimmy the Mule. Kristvashon says 'hi'.


    RaceBannonTurdBufferMrsPetersen
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 4,224
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    Mosster47 said:

    You guys are an 8 or 9 win team this year at best which is why preseason rankings are dumb.

    Last year you got pushed around by Bama and USC. Bama I get, USC not so much. Your D was beyond stacked last year but the O was a liability. This year is a decent defense with the offense still being a liability. Next year both will be a liability.

    It was a great one year run. The Seattle Times piece in 12 years will be great.

    This poast had potential, but you need to pay attention to your prose. Two "greats" in the last two lines kinda screwed it up. If you'd used "epic" or something, it would have been better.
    RaceBannonPostGameOrangeSlicesBaldwinIVTurdBuffer
  • BallzDeepBallzDeep Posts: 839
    250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes 500 Comments
    @creepycoug WSU hasn't beaten UW in five years. All of those five straight losses were ass whoopings. And yet you're here talking shit. LMAO.
    creepycougTurdBufferMrsPetersenDoog_de_Jour
  • BallzDeepBallzDeep Posts: 839
    250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes 500 Comments
    @Mosster47 70-21, 38-3. You were saying?
    creepycoug
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 4,224
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    dflea said:

    If you don't want to be called a fucking fraud, then don't play like one.

    finally a poaster with ballz. Take note turdy and ballz. This is how you take it like a man and not a whiny drippy chunt.
    RaceBannonoregonblitzkrieg
  • creepycougcreepycoug Posts: 4,224
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    BallzDeep said:

    @creepycoug WSU hasn't beaten UW in five years. All of those five straight losses were ass whoopings. And yet you're here talking shit. LMAO.

    You keep talking shit about my kewgs and I'm going to hunt you down.
    RaceBannon
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Posts: 3,506
    Standard Supporter 2500 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    UW is far from a fraud. When both starting corners weren't hurt this defense was as good as anyone in the country....maybe the best. The main problem is under center. Put McSorley in there and this team is undefeated and #3 in the cuntry. Oh, and the PacChamp vs USC is epic. UW wins by 10.

    With Browning, well, you're looking at it...a holiday bowl team.

    Bryant ain't terrible but at 5'7" he gets picked by the tall receivers. Cost us some pts against Stanford for sure.
    TurdBufferbackthepack
  • UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like, fairly solid Stanford team with a better game plan.

    The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.

    So 2017 ASU and Stanford count as big games, but 2016 Stanford, Utah, WSU, and Colorado do not? That's some fucking retarded spin.

    There's no question that the 2017 iteration of UW has done absolutely nothing impressive other than blow the doors off of some middle rung Pac-12 programs (and even if we were 10-0 right now it would still be true). But this sudden rewrite of history that tries to pretend that we didn't beat anyone worth a damn in 2016 as well, is total nonsense.
    YellowSnow79smoothdawgTurdBufferMrsPetersenPostGameOrangeSlicesbackthepack
  • jecorneljecornel Posts: 4,214
    250 Answers 2500 Comments 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    This was a one loss squad.
    MikeDamone
Sign In or Register to comment.