Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Fourth AnniversaryThird AnniversaryName Dropper5000 CommentsSwaye's WigwamSecond AnniversaryFirst Anniversary2500 Commentsblah500 Awesomes1000 CommentsTesting 1250 Awesomes500 Up Votes500 Comments250 Up Votes250 Answers100 Awesomes100 Up Votes100 Comments25 Awesomes25 Up Votes10 Comments5 Up Votes5 AwesomesFirst CommentPhotogenic

Show your support for what this community means to you:

Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Take a look around and join the community. Have a topic? Join us and start a thread.



Last Active
Member, Approved for Fight Club
  • Re: Roockets

    Everyone is a choker until they win. All that being said Chris Paul will forever be a choker. There's hope for Harden though.

    I like that the Rockets have a lot of lineup options. Gordon, Ariza, Tucker, Mbah a Moute and Capela is a lot of flexibility. If they can find the right combination that GS can't figure out they have a chance.
  • Re: Attn: white males

    Attacking someone that's asking nuance is not how you gain support.
  • Re: The most Wonderful Time of the Year-- The Hardcore Husky Holiday Edition

    Happy holidays.
  • Re: PM to Derek

    Also, if you were funny you'd have a tab open to gay porn.
  • Re: Thanks for repealing net neutrality you worthless fucking whores.

    Get ready to call me names then riddle me this - how in the fuck did the internets get so big and so many people made so much money when there was no net neutrality until 2015 when after several failed attempts to get this vital popular legislation passed failed?

    All of sudden its the most vital issue for our surfing of porn? Not buying it.

    Obama regulation that leftists are willing to blow shit up for is not convincing me. Do better

    Because net neutrality rules were in place. Verizon successfully sued in 2014 because they believed the FCC didn't have authority to force NN. That's when Title II was applied giving the FCC authority.

    HTH. Probably won't.
    They weren't in place in 2014 so that didn't help
    So Verizon sued because there weren't rules in place? Use some logic Race.
    You first

    I linked the history

    What is it you guys don't want to say about what this is really about? You can open up here. No one is reading
    Here Race. Keep in mind this article is from 2012.

    The gist for these debates was a series of decisions beginning in 2002 in which the FCC basically said cable, DSL and wireless were information services — which the FCC doesn’t regulate as stringently — as opposed to a telecommunications service which it does.

    Here's the FCC ruling in 2002.

    Who feeds you this bullshit? Genuinely curious.

    I pasted wiki

    The concept has been around for ever but only in effect since 2015. We survived 20 years with out it

    Why do you want it regulated so bad? Use your own words
    How is this difficult to understand? 2015 was the year the FCC made ISPs Title II carriers. That's the only significance of 2015. The rules stayed the same.

    The regulations are akin to ISPs being unable to touch the data entering my home.

    Why do you want to give Comcast free rein to the last mile?
    There were not rules only drafts before 2015.

    I haven't dealt with comcast since 1999

    I am far more concerned about the government stifling content than comcast. Look at the track record

    I want a free range internet. No regulations let the strong survive
    The mistake you are making is thinking Comcast and the government aren't the same thing.

    You can make up all the bullshit reasons you want to support this. None of them are why it was passed.